The Ops Leader Who Builds

Until now.

Everyone's talking about AI coding tools for two groups: developers who code 55% faster, and people organizing personal files. Nobody's talking about the group stuck in the middle—operations leaders waiting six months for workflow automation that would take two hours to build.

That gap just closed.

The Dev Backlog Trap

Here's where ops teams get stuck:

Custom reporting dashboards pulling from three different systems. Workflow automation between tools. Data pipelines to clean and transform operational data. Internal tools for team processes—approval flows, request forms, status trackers.

The traditional path looks like this:

1. Ops leader identifies the need
2. Writes requirements doc
3. Submits ticket to engineering backlog
4. Waits 3–6 months (if prioritized at all)
5. By the time it's built, requirements have changed

The cost compounds monthly. Ops teams operate with manual workarounds—spreadsheets, email chains, copy-paste between systems. Inefficiency grows while waiting for automation. You can't prove ROI because the solution never gets built. Scaling requires more headcount instead of better systems.

The problem isn't that ops leaders don't know what they need. It's that they can't build it themselves. And engineering can't build everything.

What Just Changed

On January 12, 2026, Anthropic launched Claude Cowork—bringing coding automation to non-developers. Claude Code is now bundled with Team and Enterprise plans. The focus shifted from "developers only" to "anyone who can describe what they need."

Here's what's happening in the wild:

The operations person at Every uses Claude Code for customer support research instead of pinging engineers. Anthropic's own data scientists feed entire codebases to identify pipeline dependencies and dashboard sources. Product designers map error states and logic flows to find edge cases before development starts. Altana, which builds supply chain networks, saw 2–10x development velocity improvement across teams.

The shift is clear: not "learn to code" but "describe what you need in plain language and iterate until it works."

This unlocks something critical for operations:

• Prototype internal tools in hours, not months
• Test workflow automation before committing dev resources
• Build "good enough" solutions that solve 80% of the problem today
• Prove ROI before asking for engineering investment

But I'm Not Technical

You've heard the narrative: AI coding tools are for developers. Non-technical users can organize files and create expense trackers.

Here's the reality for ops leaders.

You don't need to become a software engineer. You need to describe the workflow you want automated, test if the output does what you need, and iterate until it solves the problem.

From Anthropic's own guidance: "Using Claude Code isn't about being technical—it's about being willing to try three to four simple commands. If you can organize files in folders, you can use Claude Code."

The mental shift matters:

Old thinking: "I need to learn Python to automate this"
New reality: "I need to clearly describe what I want and validate the output"

What "building" actually looks like now isn't writing code from scratch. It's describing requirements, testing solutions, and refining based on results.

A 95% accurate model that nobody uses is worthless. An 80% accurate tool that saves your ops team 10 hours a week is gold.

What This Actually Means

Let's ground expectations.

What ops leaders can realistically build:

• Data transformation scripts (CSV cleanup, format conversion, enrichment)
• Reporting dashboards pulling from APIs
• Workflow automation between tools
• Internal process tools (request forms, approval workflows)
• Analysis and insight extraction from operational data
  ‍

What still requires engineering:

• Production systems with uptime requirements
• Customer-facing applications
• Complex security/compliance implementations
• Integration with highly custom internal systems
  ‍

The productivity data shows something interesting. Individual developers report 20–55% faster task completion with AI coding assistants. But a MIT study found seasoned developers actually took 19% longer—overhead from prompting and verification.

For ops leaders, this isn't about speed. It's about capability unlock.

The real value proposition isn't replacing engineers or becoming a developer. It's reducing dependency on the dev backlog for operational tooling.

What changes operationally:

1. Prototype before requesting dev resources (prove value first)
2. Build "good enough" internal tools without engineering
3. Free up dev capacity for product and customer work
4. Scale ops processes without adding headcount

Where to Start

Identify one high-value, low-complexity use case.

Don't start with "rebuild our entire reporting infrastructure." Start with "pull data from Salesforce API and create a weekly summary" or "automate this manual data cleanup I do every Monday."

Look for workflows that consume hours weekly but aren't complex enough to justify dev time.

Use the right tool for your access level.

If you have Team or Enterprise plan: Claude Code gives you full file system access to build local tools.
If you have Claude Max: Cowork offers a simpler interface (macOS only) focused on file and document automation.
Regular Claude with code artifacts lets you test logic and get working examples without installation.

Describe, test, iterate.

Describe the workflow in plain language. Test the output with real data—small sample first. Iterate based on what doesn't work. Don't expect perfection on first try. Expect a 70% solution that you refine.

Measure impact, then scale.

Track time saved per week. Calculate capacity unlocked (hours times team size). Decide: keep as ops-owned tool or hand to engineering for productionization? Use proven ROI to justify engineering investment if needed.

Here's the 2026 reality: The question isn't whether AI will change operations work. It's whether your ops team will build the tools they need, or keep waiting for someone else to build them.

What Could You Build This Week?

What operational tool has been sitting in your backlog for months that you could prototype this week?

You don't need to become a developer. You need to become a builder. There's a difference.

We built the AI Ops Lab to help operations leaders identify which workflows are worth automating—and which tools (AI-powered or not) will actually deliver ROI.

In one hour, we'll:

• Map your operational bottlenecks (the ones consuming hours, not minutes)
• Identify which workflows you could build vs. which need engineering
• Show you the ROI of reducing dev dependency for operational tooling
• Design your first AI-assisted automation proof of concept
  ‍

You'll walk away with:

1. A clear use case that proves the capability
2. An implementation roadmap (build vs. buy vs. request dev)
3. The answer to: "Is this worth our time?"
   ‍

No generic AI hype. Just practical guidance on what operations teams can actually build.

Schedule your AI Ops Lab session: https://www.magnetiz.ai/ai-ops-lab

The dev backlog isn't getting shorter. But your dependency on it can.